resources

← prev · next →

💼 LINKEDIN OUTREACH FRAMEWORKS

💼 LINKEDIN OUTREACH FRAMEWORKS

17. Connection Request Strategy

Context: Connection acceptance rates vary by approach Why Test This: Getting connected is step one

Framework:

BLANK REQUEST:
Send to:
- Members of same LinkedIn groups
- People who engaged with relevant posts
- Event attendees
- 2nd-degree connections through customers

WITH NOTE:
Hi [Name], saw your post on [topic] - would love to connect and follow your insights on [area].

[Your Name]

Test Variables:

  • Blank vs. personalized note
  • Note length: 1 sentence vs. 2-3 sentences
  • Targeting: Broad vs. highly specific
  • Timing: Immediate vs. after profile visit

18. Post-Connection Value Message

Context: First message sets relationship tone Why Test This: Immediate value beats immediate pitch

Framework:

Hi [Name],

Thanks for connecting. I noticed [specific observation about their work/company].

I'm working on [project/resource] around [relevant topic] and looking for feedback from people with your background in [their experience].

Would you be open to sharing your thoughts? Happy to send over what I have.

No pitch - genuinely looking for insights.

[Your Name]

Test Variables:

  • Timing: Immediately vs. 24 hours later
  • Ask type: Feedback vs. share resource vs. question
  • Length: Brief vs. contextual
  • “No pitch” disclaimer: Include vs. omit

19. The Trigger-Based Message

Context: Timely relevance increases response rates Why Test This: Shows you’re paying attention

Framework:

[Name], congrats on [recent promotion/funding/product launch]!

Quick thought: Now that [company] is [specific change], you'll likely face [related challenge].

Most [similar role/company] find [specific pain point] becomes critical at this stage.

Mind if I ask - how are you thinking about [related area]?

[Your Name]

Test Variables:

  • Trigger type: Job change vs. company news vs. content engagement
  • Timing: Same day vs. next day
  • Question vs. insight statement
  • Length: 3 sentences vs. 5 sentences

20. The Multi-Touch Sequence

Context: Persistence with value increases response Why Test This: Most conversions happen after multiple touches

Framework:

[Touch 1 - Day 0]:
Thanks for connecting, [Name]!

Noticed [specific observation]. Impressive work on [thing].

[Touch 2 - Day 4]:
[Name], quick question - are you dealing with [challenge] at [Company]?

Been helping [similar companies] solve this. Would a quick exchange of ideas be useful?

[Touch 3 - Day 9]:
[Name], totally understand you're busy.

Last thing: Here's a [resource] on [topic] - thought it might be useful regardless of whether we chat.

Good luck with [specific project/goal]!

Test Variables:

  • Touch count: 2 vs. 3 vs. 4
  • Spacing: 3 days vs. 5 days vs. 7 days
  • Value inclusion: Each message vs. final only
  • Exit message tone: Friendly vs. final ask

21. The Mutual Connection Bridge

Context: Shared connections transfer trust Why Test This: Reduces stranger barrier

Framework:

Hi [Name],

I see we're both connected to [Mutual Connection].

I was talking to [them] about [topic] and your work at [Company] came up in context of [specific thing].

Would love to connect and learn more about [relevant project/challenge].

Also happy to share [relevant insight/resource] if useful.

[Your Name]

Test Variables:

  • Permission to mention: Ask mutual connection first vs. general mention
  • Context specificity: Vague vs. detailed
  • Offer inclusion: Yes vs. no
  • Follow-up if no response: Yes vs. no